When it comes to vape pods, Lost Vape is a renowned brand that offers a range of devices with attractive designs and impressive features. In this comparison review article, we will evaluate three models from Lost Vape: the Ursa Pocket, Ursa Nano S, and Ursa Nano Art. These devices cater to different vaping preferences and come with unique features. We will assess their design, features, battery capacity, and overall performance to help you make an informed decision.
Design
Starting with the Ursa Nano Art Pod stands out with its artistic design, featuring a transparent PC material construction that offers a delicate and compact finish. This vape device is visually appealing and sure to catch the eye of vapers who appreciate aesthetics. On the other hand, the Ursa Pocket Vape boasts a versatile design with a zinc alloy and stainless steel body. It comes in various leather versions and vibrant color patterns, allowing users to find their favorite style. Both devices excel in terms of design, providing options for different preferences.
Features
The Ursa Nano Art Pod offers a 5 to 18W output, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced vapers who prefer mouth-to-lung (MTL) vaping. It comes with an 800mAh built-in battery that supports quick charging via the USB Type-C interface. The Ursa Nano Art Pod also features the Ursa cartridge with an integrated mesh coil, delivering a satisfying vaping experience.
Meanwhile, the Ursa Pocket Vape is equipped with a Mission chip and is compatible with the UB Little coils series vaporizers. It offers a power range of 5 to 30 watts, making it suitable for both MTL and restricted direct lung (RDL) vaping. The device features a 1.71-inch OLED display and intuitive settings buttons for easy customization. With a 1200mAh battery capacity, the Ursa Pocket Vape provides longer vaping sessions.
Battery
In terms of battery capacity, the Ursa Nano Art Pod features an 800mAh battery, which is decent for its compact size. It offers a balance between portability and battery life, allowing users to enjoy vaping sessions without frequent recharging. On the other hand, the Ursa Pocket Vape takes the lead with its 1200mAh battery, offering extended usage time before requiring a recharge. This makes it an excellent choice for vapers who prefer longer vaping sessions or frequently vaping throughout the day.
Read Also: Lost Vape Ursa Pocket Vape vs. Orion Bar 7500: A Detailed Comparison
Conclusion
Both the Ursa Nano Art Pod and Ursa Pocket Vape from Lost Vape have their unique strengths. The Ursa Nano Art Pod stands out with its artistic design and compact size, making it a visually appealing option for vapers. It offers an enjoyable MTL vaping experience and features an 800mAh battery with quick charge technology. On the other hand, the Ursa Pocket Vape appeals to users with its versatile design, larger battery capacity of 1200mAh, and wider power range suitable for both MTL and RDL vaping. The 1.71-inch OLED display and intuitive settings buttons further enhance the device’s functionality. Ultimately, the choice between these devices depends on personal preferences, with the Ursa Nano Art Pod offering a more compact option and the Ursa Pocket Vape providing a longer-lasting battery and broader vaping capabilities.